The calls that did not connect
On 8 November 2023 an Optus outage left 2,145 emergency calls unsuccessful, and Optus then failed to make 369 welfare checks it was required to make. Three Optus companies paid just over $12 million. The notice for Optus Mobile says paym…
Optus's nationwide outage on 8 November 2023 left 2,145 unsuccessful emergency calls, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) found, and Optus then failed to carry out 369 welfare checks it was required to make 1.
It took just under a year to reach an ending. Three Optus companies paid infringement notices totalling $12,000,420, dated 4 November 2024 and announced four days later 23. An infringement notice is a penalty set by the regulator, which a company can pay to end the matter without going to court. "Payment is not an admission of liability," the notice for Optus Mobile states 3. This article sets out what ACMA found, how it ended, and the same duty enforced elsewhere in the same period, before the record returns to Optus twenty-two months later.
01The duty
Access to Triple Zero is not left to a telco's discretion. In a media release of 30 July 2026 about the second major Optus outage, of 18 September 2025, ACMA described the duty in its own words 4.
“Giving access to the emergency call service is not optional, it is a fundamental legal obligation and the most important public safety responsibility telecommunications providers have”
ACMA, media release, 30 July 2026That is the duty ACMA found Optus had failed in November 2023.
02What ACMA found
Of the 2,145 unsuccessful emergency calls ACMA counted, 2,144 were made to 000 or 112, the calls ACMA treats as access failures: 2,091 on Optus Mobile, 41 on Optus Networks and 12 on Optus Internet. One further call went to 106 1.
ACMA also found that Optus failed to carry out 369 welfare checks it was required to make after unsuccessful emergency calls, a count taken after legal exceptions removed 1,593 calls: 361 for Optus Mobile and 8 for Optus Networks 1. ACMA's chair said its findings indicated the outage should have been preventable 2.
“Our findings indicate that Optus failed in the management of its network in a number of areas and that the outage should have been preventable.”
ACMA Chair Nerida O'Loughlin, 8 November 202403How it ended
The three infringement notices covered 4,698 alleged contraventions of section 148(1) of the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act: Optus Mobile $11,098,980, Optus Networks $676,080 and Optus Internet $225,360, adding to $12,000,420 3. The notices ended the matter without a court case. They are dated 4 November 2024, just under a year after the outage, and ACMA announced them on 8 November 23.
Optus did admit part of it. Before the notices were issued, it acknowledged in writing that it had breached the welfare-check rule 1.
“In Optus' 24 September 2024 response, Optus acknowledged that it contravened subsection 28(1) of the Determination by failing to undertake a welfare check.”
ACMA investigation report, November 2024The notices covered all 4,698 alleged contraventions between them. The notice for Optus Mobile states that payment carries no admission 3.
“Payment does not equate to a finding that the contraventions occurred. Payment is not an admission of liability.”
Infringement notice, Optus Mobile, 4 November 2024Three infringement notices, no court case, and the notice for Optus Mobile says payment is not an admission.
04The same rules, the same period
The same rules were enforced against Telstra the next month. ACMA said Telstra, the Emergency Call Person, paid a penalty of more than $3 million, announced on 11 December 2024, for what it said were 473 breaches, with 127 calls not transferred, during a disruption at its own Triple Zero call centre 5.
“Telstra Limited (Telstra) has paid a penalty of more than $3 million for failing to comply with emergency call rules during a technical disruption at its Triple Zero emergency call centre.”
ACMA, media release, 11 December 2024The disruption lasted about 90 minutes, on 1 March 2024 5.
In the same period, a separate ACMA action turned on a different part of the Triple Zero system. On 6 March 2024, ACMA announced that Optus Mobile had paid $1,501,500 after failing to upload data for close to 200,000 Coles Mobile and Catch Connect customers to the Integrated Public Number Database between January 2021 and September 2023, the database Triple Zero uses for caller location 6. The database also feeds the Emergency Alert warning system.
ACMA also accepted a court-enforceable undertaking requiring an independent review of Optus's compliance with the database, and directed Optus to comply with the industry code that governs it.
“If the ACMA finds Optus fails to comply with the direction or the enforceable undertaking, it may commence proceedings in the Federal Court, which can order penalties up to $10 million per breach.”
ACMA, media release, 6 March 2024ACMA said it was not aware of anyone directly harmed by the failure.
“While we are not aware of anyone being directly harmed due to the non-compliance in this case, it's alarming that Optus placed so many customers in this position for so long.”
ACMA member Samantha Yorke, 6 March 2024ACMA added that over the past 18 months it had taken action against five telcos for breaches of the same database rules, with financial penalties totalling more than $2 million 6.
THE REPORTING RORT has already set the $12 million Triple Zero notices beside the country's privacy-breach enforcement record.
05Twenty-two months
Twenty-two months after the first outage, it happened again. On 18 September 2025, a second major outage hit Optus's Triple Zero calls. On 30 July 2026, ACMA began Federal Court proceedings against Optus Mobile, alleging 1,005 contraventions of two emergency call obligations. Those allegations are, at this point, untested 4.
ACMA said the recurrence, so soon after the first outage, was one of its reasons for going to court 4.
“The recurrence of a major network outage affecting emergency calls so soon after the November 2023 outage is a significant concern and one of the reasons the ACMA has decided to take this matter to court.”
ACMA, media release, 30 July 2026Optus, in its submission to the Senate committee examining the second major outage, said improvements had been made since November 2023 and more was needed 7.
“Despite improvements implemented since that time, the 2025 outage shows that further action is required by industry and government to collaboratively ensure the resilience of the Triple Zero ecosystem.”
Optus, submission to the Senate Environment and Communications Committee, 2025What ACMA alleges about the second major outage, and what a court might do with it, is the next part of this case.
Questions have not yet been put to ACMA or Optus; any answers will be added as dated updates.
If it’s a rort, we cover it.
- Record: THE TRIPLE ZERO RORT, article 1, "The calls that did not connect", publishedRight-of-reply questions to ACMA and Optus have not been sent; this article publishes ahead of them, with any answers added as dated updates.
Read the desk note
ATTENDED 25 September 2026 (case: THE TRIPLE ZERO RORT, article 1 of four).
FINDING. The Australian Communications and Media Authority found that Optus's 8 November 2023 outage produced 2,145 unsuccessful emergency calls and 369 welfare checks that were required and not carried out. Three Optus companies paid infringement notices totalling $12,000,420, and the notice for Optus Mobile states that payment is not an admission of liability. This article sets out that record, the same duty enforced against Telstra, a separate penalty over the database Triple Zero uses for caller location, and the recurrence twenty-two months later that has now put Optus Mobile before the Federal Court.
ARTICLE CHANGES. Article 1, "The calls that did not connect", published, covering the 2023 outage, ACMA's findings, the infringement notices, the Telstra and IPND penalties in the same period, and the handoff to the 2025 outage. Article 3 of this case, "One thousand and five", publishes alongside it; two more articles are held pending right of reply.
STILL OPEN. Right-of-reply questions to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (case plan questions 1 and 2) and to Optus (question 12) have not been sent. Any answers, or their absence, will be added here as dated updates.
NEXT DATE: not yet set. No hearing date for ACMA's Federal Court case against Optus Mobile has been located; this desk will watch for one once it is listed.
- https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/Investigation%20report%20-%20Optus%20outage%201Nov23%20%28redacted%29.pdf
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-11/optus-pays-12-million-penalty-triple-zero-outage
- https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-11/Infringement%20notice%20-%20Optus%20Mobile%20%28redacted%29.pdf
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2026-07/acma-takes-optus-mobile-court-over-september-2025-triple-zero-outage
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-12/telstra-pays-3-million-penalty-triple-zero-outage
- https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-03/optus-penalised-15m-public-safety-failures
- https://www.optus.com.au/content/dam/optus/cloud/documents/about-us/media-centre/speeches-and-reports/2025/Senate_Environment_and_Communications_Committee_Triple_Zero_service_outage_Optus_Submission.pdf